- @Oakwright no, not THAC0! that was the #1 thing that I was most excited about in 3rd edition: the end of THAC0. in reply to Oakwright #
- @Oakwright Second edition! /shakes cane to kids to get off the lawn in reply to Oakwright #
- @Oakwright quite the opposite. (public game; it was a hilarious experience; a prof recommended they try D&D for acting-type practice.) in reply to Oakwright #
- @Oakwright @olybuzz funny u shd mention that. once played w/2 law students. (one wanted to play a lizardman. the joke writes itself.) in reply to Oakwright #
- @Oakwright @olybuzz 🙁 in reply to Oakwright #
- @rogue_3 fwiw, compendium is newer so should be "correct." and to be honest, it hasn't been a huge problem in play. just annoying. in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 @olybuzz The f'd-up thing, as far as I can see, is that 4e is chock-full of "errata" which makes for odd diffs between texts. in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 @olybuzz IMHO: Rules Compendium is how to play, doesn't include how to create a character. (FWIW, been playing w/out PHB.) in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 @olybuzz I'll have to track down the alignments chart from either 1e or Basic. It's AWESOME. #embraceTheWeird in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 I'm leaning towards OSRIC if I DM, tho I haven't used yet. seems to hit balance between "classic" & D20. (most of my exp is w/D20) in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 we've talked extensively (!!!!) about hybrid rules, since we have materials going all the way back to basic. in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 he hasn't yet played 4; last time game together was 3.5/d20. I'm in a 4e game with some other folks (not on twitter far as I know) in reply to rogue_3 #
- @rogue_3 damn. (one time I did a vanity google search & found JPL press releases from 1987. http://t.co/oQsW28o & http://t.co/c9SIo79) in reply to rogue_3 #
- fun word I learned today: Ultracrepidarianism: "habit of giving opinions/advice on matters outside of one's knowledge" http://t.co/8razmGk #
- @godlessgirl …spot on application for "name of yr pastor" (IIRC) made me O.o but then read more about them: yep, religious charity. in reply to godlessgirl #
- @godlessgirl tricky when u don't realize it's a religious org. once thought abt applying for job at a charity that I hadn't realized was… in reply to godlessgirl #
- @godlessgirl *explicitly* religious orgs? (ie, church secretary) bugs me on a visceral level, but makes sense logically. in reply to godlessgirl #
- BTW, @skud is still taking that survey of people who've had g+ accounts suspended: http://t.co/UYK72CC #
Powered by Twitter Tools